Get matched with top swimming pool in ground builders or installers in your area

If you want a lower-maintenance pool with greater energy efficiency and a quick installation timeframe,a fiberglass pool is worth the investment. However, if affordability is your top priority, you might prefer a more inexpensive vinyl pool.

With proper maintenance, a fiberglass pool lasts 30 to 50 years. To maintain your pool, check the water pH daily, run the filter continuously, and refinish the shell when it reaches 20 to 30 years old. These maintenance practices preserve your pool’s durability and appearance throughout its lifespan.

When you consider the up-front investment, a fiberglass pool is more expensive than a vinyl pool. The premium materials and installation methods required for fiberglass pools result in a higher initial cost, while their reduced maintenance requirements lower long-term expenses. In contrast, vinyl pools rely on cheaper materials but incur additional costs over time due to more frequent replacements and upkeep.

Installing a fiberglass pool takes four to six weeks from start to finish. This period covers excavation, material preparation, and the complete installation process along with any integrated add-ons. Coordinated project management ensures the pool is ready on schedule, enabling a prompt start to the swimming season and minimizing any delays in enjoying your new pool.

Yes, you can integrate additional features such as a patio or hot tub with your fiberglass pool. Combining these projects enhances your outdoor living space by providing a safe and inviting area for relaxation and socializing. Coordinated installation streamlines the process and maximizes project value while ensuring that all elements work together harmoniously from day one.

Fiberglass pools cost $15,000 to $75,000, while concrete pools cost $35,000 to $100,000. This cost discrepancy indicates that fiberglass pools require less installation time and incur lower maintenance expenses than concrete pools. In addition, concrete pools demand extensive customization and higher upkeep, which increases the overall investment compared to the more cost‐efficient fiberglass option.